Case Study

Global CRO Drives Study Startup Efficiency By Converting Local IRB Sites To Central IRB Review

Source: Advarra

PRA Health Sciences partnered with Advarra to increase the number of sites relying on central IRB review, streamlining startup and increasing overall study efficiency.

The Challenge

Research sites that rely on a local IRB typically take at least twice as long to activate than sites that can rely on the study’s single central IRB. Utilizing central IRB review not only helps streamline study startup but also enables increased efficiencies in managing sites throughout the study’s lifecycle. PRA Health Sciences, a global contract research organization (CRO), worked with a substantial volume of sites that historically were required to leverage local IRBs for approvals. On average, PRA saw about a 30/70 split of central vs. local IRB review across their study portfolio.

The Ask

PRA wanted to flip the ratio so that more sites could take advantage of the efficiencies, transparency, and time savings enabled by using a central IRB to improve the overall study startup processes and timelines. The PRA team estimated that working with local IRBs cost PRA and its clients substantially more time with less transparency than working with their central IRB partner.

To learn more about Advarra, visit their Clinical Leader page.

access the Case Study!

Get unlimited access to:

Trend and Thought Leadership Articles
Case Studies & White Papers
Extensive Product Database
Members-Only Premium Content
Welcome Back! Please Log In to Continue. X

Enter your credentials below to log in. Not yet a member of Clinical Leader? Subscribe today.

Subscribe to Clinical Leader X

Please enter your email address and create a password to access the full content, Or log in to your account to continue.


Subscribe to Clinical Leader