Case Study

Seamless Mid-Study IRT Implementation: Preserving Data Integrity With Retrospective Manual Entry

clinical-trials-tech-GettyImages-1867575053

Mid-study protocol amendments that add randomization can leave sponsors exposed—especially when a trial launches without an Interactive Response Technology (IRT) system in place. Reconstructing subject and inventory history after the fact carries real risk: misaligned screening and randomization IDs, mismatches between IRT and EDC records, and audit gaps that can jeopardize regulatory confidence. This case study examines how one oncology sponsor navigated exactly that challenge, implementing IRT mid-study across five sites without disrupting ongoing enrollment or compromising data integrity. For sponsors facing a similar mid-study shift, this case study offers a practical framework for balancing speed, accuracy, and regulatory compliance—helping study teams avoid downstream data reconciliation issues and protect study integrity when operational complexity increases unexpectedly.

access the Case Study!

Get unlimited access to:

Trend and Thought Leadership Articles
Case Studies & White Papers
Extensive Product Database
Members-Only Premium Content
Welcome Back! Please Log In to Continue. X

Enter your credentials below to log in. Not yet a member of Clinical Leader? Subscribe today.

Subscribe to Clinical Leader X

Please enter your email address and create a password to access the full content, Or log in to your account to continue.

or

Subscribe to Clinical Leader

Almac Clinical Technologies