White Paper

The Paper Chase: Clinical Outcomes Assessments In The Digital Age

Source: TransPerfect

By Mark Wade, Global Practice Leader Life Sciences, COA SME, TransPerfect

Patient with ipad

Patients are, at last, gaining a voice in healthcare. Stakeholders have come to recognize that patients have valuable information to share about their experiences with diseases and medications that should influence policy and treatment decisions.

The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA), for example, has launched an initiative, “The Voice of the Patient,” to gather patient perspectives across specific disease areas. Information reported by clinical trial participants on their symptoms and health practices is increasingly important to the success of studies proving the safety and efficacy of investigational drugs. Then, once products are on the market and payers require evidence of their health economic value, there’s a growing demand for patient-reported data as proof points.

Patient data are collected via clinical outcomes assessment (COA) tools that can be either paper-based or electronic, with the latter in the form of voice response systems, web portals, specialized handheld devices, and smartphones. Here, we’ll review the pros and cons of the different modalities and offer our perspective on the future of COA tools.


Get unlimited access to:

Trend and Thought Leadership Articles
Case Studies & White Papers
Extensive Product Database
Members-Only Premium Content
Welcome Back! Please Log In to Continue. X

Enter your credentials below to log in. Not yet a member of Clinical Leader? Subscribe today.

Subscribe to Clinical Leader X

Please enter your email address and create a password to access the full content, Or log in to your account to continue.


Subscribe to Clinical Leader