Who Is Responsible When AI Helps Write The Consent Form?

As artificial intelligence becomes more embedded in clinical research workflows, its role in shaping informed consent materials is raising complex ethical and regulatory questions. With limited formal guidance from agencies, research teams and oversight bodies are navigating a gray area — balancing efficiency with transparency and accountability.
Key considerations include whether AI involvement should be disclosed, how to validate system accuracy, and what safeguards are needed to prevent overlooked errors. Human oversight remains central, particularly as AI-generated content can appear polished while masking inaccuracies. Clear documentation of system purpose, data handling practices, and validation efforts is essential for review.
Ultimately, responsibility does not shift away from the clinical team; human accountability and participant trust remain foundational. Discover how emerging best practices are defining responsible AI use in consent processes.
Get unlimited access to:
Enter your credentials below to log in. Not yet a member of Clinical Leader? Subscribe today.