EMR vs. eSource: Why So Many Research Sites Don't Use EMR As The Source Data Collection Tool

Examine the limitations of using Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) in clinical research compared to eSource systems. EMRs, tailored for patient care and billing, utilize standardized templates that fail to meet the nuanced and specific data demands of clinical trials. These systems are not designed to manage the precise, study-specific data collection essential for research, making them unsuitable for research-specific procedures, which are often conducted outside the EMR framework.

Historically, research sites relied on paper-based data collection, but there is a noticeable shift towards eSource systems like CRIO eSource. These systems provide customizable, study-specific templates and facilitate remote monitoring, significantly enhancing data quality and reducing protocol deviations. By integrating seamlessly with Electronic Data Capture (EDC) systems, eSource platforms improve patient safety and streamline data management processes. This transition underscores the growing need for more specialized and adaptable systems in clinical research to ensure accuracy and efficiency in data handling.