Your eTMF And Your Study Sites: How To Close The Document Gap

Not all sponsors and CROs that select and implement an Electronic Trial Master File (eTMF) solve the bottlenecks and inefficiencies that the system was selected to target.

Why?
Often, during the vendor selection process, organizations undervalue the need for site acceptance, disregard the impact of vendor support teams, overlook critical implementation processes, and don’t fully understand the correlation between software capabilities and the bottlenecks they address.

The biggest challenge that ultimately affects how well an eTMF system performs is its ability to drive site collaboration and integrate with the tools sites are already using.

With over 7,200 research sites connected to the Florence Network, we understand the delicate relationship between the sponsor/CRO and the site and how a digitally integrated eTMF and eISF can significantly impact the overall success of a Clinical Trial.

To help guide sponsors and CROs through a smoother and more fruitful eTMF process, we created this article to address common friction points, such as:

• Selecting an eTMF Vendor
• Implementing an eTMF
• Site Collaboration