Learn how a current clinical study is leveraging disruptive mHealth technologies to ensure that collecting study data is accurate, seamless, and convenient.
There has been a strong focus on study conduct, but as stakeholders are increasingly aware that better SSU processes are linked to shorter clinical timelines, the emphasis is shifting in that direction.
The webinar will focus on study startup and discuss site selection practices from both the site and the Sponsor/CRO perspective.
Informed consent has a major impact on regulatory compliance, enrollment rates and expenses across the life of your study. Yet the traditional paper-based process has transformed informed consent into one of the most cited deficiencies.
This webinar will address common collaboration obstacles from both the CRO perspective and the sponsor perspective with a focus on increasing the value of strategic partnerships.
The industry's shift from paper to electronic Clinical Outcome Assessments (eCOA) in clinical trials is happening at dizzying speeds.
Learn about mobile innovation for virtual, hybrid, and site-based clinical trials using the Clinical Reach™ mClinical™ platform for patient enrollment, engagement, and management on a global scale. Followed by an in-depth Q&A session and Parallel 6 Chief Medical Officer, Brad Pruitt, M.D., MBA, who demonstrates the newly released mobile data monitoring solution which is designed to empower clinical research associates (CRAs).
Learn how innovative mobile technology helps clinical trial participants stay engaged and compliant through the empowerment of the patient’s loved ones. Speaker, Stephen J. Freedland, M.D. (Urologist at Cedars Sinai DEPT of Surgery), presents a compelling case discussion on the importance of patient compliance and market approval, followed by Chief Medical Officer of Parallel 6, Brad Pruitt, M.D., MBA, who demonstrates the new Clinical Reach™ companion app followed by an in-depth Q&A session covering clinical use and various trial applications.
The evaluation of the compatibility between scores from an electronic version of a paper-based questionnaire, better known as equivalence testing, is usually taken as a requirement for ensuring that data from electronic versions of patient reported outcomes does not vary from that captured on paper. This webinar discusses the results of a recently published meta-analysis which examined all published equivalence tests from 2007 to 2013. This webinar discusses equivalence testing, how the current meta-analysis run, and what the results mean in context of the field of eCOA.
Interest in using electronic patient reported outcomes (ePRO) on smart devices is on the rise. In this webinar, Emily Cantrell and Becky Baggett will share lessons learned working on a large phase 3 pain study that utilizes ePRO on tablet devices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|